Black Panther
Friday, March 9, 2018 8:28:38 AM | (Age Not Specified)
Referencing the writer who commented on March 8, 2017 that "Someone has to defend against spam": I now direct a quote from another recent comment given for another movie, given by someone I don't know: "The review is supposed to rate the plot, the acting and the overall entertainment." I'm saying: If a patron says he or she liked the story line, the movie kept him or her interested, the actor or actress did a great job, the costumes were excellent, this Marvel movie was spot on in comparison with the actual comic book story, the movie was fun, he or she loved the movie soundtrack, the movie was entertaining, the plot was interesting, the movie transitioned well, then they have made relevant comments. They might however comment negatively on each of those factors. That would also be relevant. Some men like a movie due to the woman actress staring in it, some women due to the man actor staring in it. These things are relevant due to they will draw people to watch a movie. Is that a meaninngful factor to comment on? Well that's in the mind of the beholder and represents free expression. Some patrons have read the comic story and some have not. This might affect their perception of the movie. One commenter said this movie lived up to the comic story. Some people will watch a movie out of curiosity or based on reviews. I will watch a movie that I think might be interesting regardless of negative reviews or comments - to see for myself. We all come from different perspectives and bring our perspectives to the rating systems. Some comments do sound like spammers and haters. In the end, this movie speaks for itself, how successful it's been so far in terms of movie box office sales. Also, unlike other movies I've watched recently, this movie has generated a lot of comments. A lot.